• No Fields Found.

  • About

    Buildjournal is an independent E46 M3 enthusiast site dedicated to BMW builders, track go-ers and auto photographers. We specialize is tuning performance and community support.
- Advertisement -
E46 M3 E85 Flex Fuel
Home » Tech Guides

Alignment Specs Adjustment Guide for Your E46 M3

Andrew Posted On June 14, 2016
18
5.1K Views
0


Here’s a one stop alignment specs adjustment guide you’ve been searching for. If you ever asked “What kind of alignment should I get for my E46 M3?”, you came to the right place. Here are some recommended tire sizes and alignments for your E46 M3 in a variety of scenarios.

These are meant to be used as a cheat sheet guide and may differ from different suspension setups or preferences. But generally these will get you in the ballpark so you can just fine tune by yourself.

Alignment Specs Basics:

  • Rear Toe In gives you high speed stability at a cost of tire wear
  • Camber does not affect tire wear, toe does
  • Front toe out +.05 may help with the inherent lazy center feel and quicker turn in for E46 M3 at a cost of additional tire wear.
Type of DrivingFront Camber (Degrees)Rear Camber (Degrees)Front Toe (Inches)Rear Toe (Inches)
Stock-1.0-2.0.18.23
Sporty-2.0-1.80 .15
Autocross-2.5-2.0-.05 .08
Track Day-3.5-2.50.08

Tire and Height:

  • Square setup (same size) allows you to rotate your wheels
  • Square setup will experience tram lining (car follows the imperfections of road)
  • Stagger setup will tend to understeer 
Type of DrivingFront TiresRear TiresFront Height (in from Center Cap)Rear Height (in from Center Cap)
Economical 235/35/18265/35/181414.5
Sporty245/35/18265/35/1813.513.5
Autocross265/35/18265/35/181313
Track Day275/35/18275/35/1812.512.5

Rebound & Compression:

  • Rebound – Available on Single Adjustable Coilovers
  • Compression – Available on Double Adjustable Coilovers
Type of DrivingFront Rebound Rear Rebound Front Compression Rear Compression
Economical StockStockStockStock
Sporty60%60%StockStock
Autocross50%80%70%80%
Track Day80%75%95%85%

Spring Rates:

Type of DrivingFront Spring Rates (in/lbs)Rear Spring Rate (In/Pounds)
Economical StockStock
Sporty450500
Autocross500550
Track Day700800

Additional Suspension Tuning:

If you are interested in further tuning your shocks, please take a look at our Fine Tune Suspension and Shocks Guide. Remember, keep your bushings in tip top shape!The E46 M3 has many bushings including Rear Trail Arm Bushings (RTAB) which I recommend to replace every 50,000 miles and the Front Control Arm Bushings (FCAB) and Rear Control Arm Bushings (RCAB) to replace every 100,000 miles. Shoutout to Obioban for the awesome maintenance schedule on M3Forums.


Have an alignment to suggest or have questions about fitment? Comment Below!

Post Views: 5,111

- Advertisement -


You may also like
The F80 M3 Competition Stock Exhaust is Loud
April 24, 2017
Sam’s Alpine White F80 M3 Competition Package in HDR
April 17, 2017
E30 M3 with V8 Does Burnout in Public Tunnel
April 12, 2017
18 Comments

Duncan Ross
November 10, 2017 at 12:40 pm
Reply

Hi,
Thanks for the great info. If you have -.08 rear toe does that mean the rear wheels will point outward.


    Oscar
    November 10, 2017 at 10:00 pm
    Reply

    It will be inward.

    Toe In. Talk with your alignment guy. some shops use the +/- sign and some don’t

      Duncan Ross
      November 12, 2017 at 4:33 am

      Ok thanks. I did do some research regarding the allignment machines and toe in is classed as positive + toe. Toe out is classed as -negative.
      Toe and camber are opposite which is strange.

alan
September 30, 2017 at 6:26 pm
Reply

On my 2005 M3 I currently have Koni sports, H&R Camber plates. Springs are linear with 430 front, 600 rear. Not sure on the height, the car is low but nothing rubs. Tire are 18 275/35. Camber in the front is 3.5 – I need to get adjustable arms for the rear.

However the current setup has the car relatively neutral. Some oversteer but nothing that is created by specific inputs.

I just increased my castor to the full amount available in the plates, it was set at half the available. This coming weekend is a track event at Summit Point, WV. Shenandoah is the track, its tight with 22 some turns in 2 or so miles. I was there last year with a slightly different setup ( minus the camber plates ) so this year should be even more funt.


brian
September 7, 2017 at 9:56 am
Reply

Whats up andrew, can i ask your current specs?


skip
August 14, 2017 at 7:39 am
Reply

I’ve got a 2003.5 I’m building to compete in STU at nationals. Ive got poly bushings (powerflex purple/black) everywhere, and h&r suspension. Currently running the 235/255r18 setup. What tires/alignment spec would you recommend? im looking at re71r’s, but trying to decide if i want to step the rears up to 265’s over 255’s


    Andrew Lim
    August 14, 2017 at 10:41 am
    Reply

    Stick with your your 235f/255r setup, camber -3f -2r, just a hair of toe, 34 psi front/36 psi rear hot, and set your height to 13.5/13 inch from center cap to fender. I think that would be a good start. Basically, your car is going to understeer because of the staggered setup. All your setting optimizations should revolve around getting rid of that understeer. Go out there and take notes of how your car is handling entering the corner, at apex, and corner exit then make the necessary adjustments with the following rules in mind. If you’re understeering: 1. Reduce tire pressure in front and increase in rear. 2. If you have coilover dampening, increase stiffness in rear. The most important thing though is learning so go out there and talk to as many people as you can. Especially the guy setting his PB. 🙂

      skip
      August 14, 2017 at 12:57 pm

      what about going 245/40/18 F and 275/35/r18 R? would that offer a noticable performance gain? im needing to buy new tires anyway, the tires on the car are goodyear eagle all seasons 450 TW and they are horrible. Those sizes above will work with my wheels while adding more contact patch and only add about 6% total to the price of tires

        Oscar
        August 14, 2017 at 1:01 pm

        Hey Skip,

        Oscar here.
        I recommend a square setup to get rid of that understeer, if you can (I forget what STU class ruling is on tire sizes). I ran 245/275 in the rear before and it slowed my acceleration down quite a bit. No noticeable gain in grip and had even more understeer. Unless you have a full bolt on m3, I don’t think 275 in the rear would help much and even then you would need 275 in the front to benefit from it. The staggered setup where the front tire size is smaller than the rear will be the culprit. If you can increase the front tire size, that would be your best bet and most to gain.

        You want the front and rear tires to be as close as possible and the fronts to be as wide as possible. Improves braking, balance, and has a neutral drive characteristic.

        For autocross STU class, you want as much negative camber as you can in the front without bumping up a class (you can do so by removing the camber pins in the front strut. This will help with rotating the car around sharp cones so you can power out on the exit quicker.

        Try Federal RSR tires, they’re good performance for the buck. For most competitive setups, most people run 265/265 or 275/275

      skip
      August 14, 2017 at 1:30 pm

      for some reason i cant respond to oscar so im replying where i can. My front wheels can support the 255’s as well, so i could do 255’s square. my only worry with that is tramlining, which is why i was looking at staggered setups. how much of that is something i need to actually worry about vs people exaggerating how bad tramlining occurs. Thanks for the speedy responses guys.

        Oscar
        August 14, 2017 at 3:59 pm

        Hey Skip,

        Tramlining is going to happen with a square setup especially on highway. You could try a little toe in on front and rear to get back a little stability at the expense of tire wear.

        I run 265/265 with no toe in front and a little toe in rear for the track for high speed stability. Its doable as a daily. But if you were getting competitive with the M3, I would live with a little tramlining to save some tire.
        It does show during highway driving or super bad roads. Follows the grooves of the road. But on a good surface, it does handle really well and predictable.
        So I would say you can’t really take your hands off the wheels anymore for any reason because of tramlining and you have to pay attention more to the roads. You should be getting a lot more feedback on the roads which is good and bad at the same time. Any imperfections, you will have to feel and counter but im probably exaggerating a bit.

        For autocross, I would do toe out in the front to get a bit more rotation in the rear. But its going to make tramlining even worse.

        I guess the question is now, how much of a daily is your M3 vs how competitive you want to be in autocross.

gianluca
July 8, 2017 at 12:04 pm
Reply

i have a 2006 e46 m3 running stock springs and shocks.
my tire sizes are 235/35/19 front and 265/30/19.
i am going in for an alignment.
what should i get for a more sport or aggressive feel


    Andrew Lim
    July 12, 2017 at 9:01 pm
    Reply

    You can try adding 0.2-0.5 degrees of negative camber all around and lower your tire pressure to around 35 front / 30 rear. This isn’t your ideal DD setup, but something to try since it won’t be too much of a wear on your tires. Just make sure you have 0 toe.

Jorge Flores
June 22, 2017 at 8:53 pm
Reply

Nice article. Have any recommendations when running 19″ (zcp or csl) with Coilovers or damper suspension kits?


    Andrew Lim
    June 29, 2017 at 7:41 pm
    Reply

    Hey what’s up Jorge. For entry level regardless of track/daily, I always recommend BC Racing + upgraded Swift (linear) springs. BC Racing comes with camber plates which is a plus. Alternative to BC is ST, which is owned by KW. However with ST, you don’t get the adjustable dampening like the BC. An upgrade from that is the KW V3 and other exterior reservoir systems like Moton, but those get pricey. Keep in mind most people run linear springs to avoid rubbing issues with the inside wheel barrel and shock. KW V3 for example has progressive springs \/ vs || which causes fitment issues. Consult clearance before you decide on a set.

Amr Elamir
February 1, 2017 at 7:24 am
Reply

Graet post. Is this guide applicable for non-m e46’s? Thanks in advance.


    Oscar Li
    February 27, 2017 at 8:51 am
    Reply

    Yes this guide is applicable to all RWD Front Engine Car

    Andrew Lim
    April 10, 2017 at 7:11 pm
    Reply

    Tire size and spring rates are different on the E46 M3 so take those with a grain of salt, but for the others like alignment and rebound, you can apply the same theory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


You are reading
Alignment Specs Adjustment Guide for Your E46 M3
Share 18 Comments